PERCEPTIONS OF SEX ROLES OF YOUNG AND MIDDLE-AGED WOMEN AND MENETAUGH C; WEBER S.1982; PERCEPT. MOT. SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 55; NO 2; PP. 559-562; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

SEX-ROLE ORIENTATION, STRESS, AND SUBSEQUENT HEALTH STATUS DEMONSTRATED BY TWO SCORING PROCEDURES FOR BEM'S SCALEWECH BA.1983; PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 52; NO 1; PP. 69-70; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDIZATION OF INSTRUMENTS MEASURING FOUR ASPECTS OF SEX-ROLES IN PRIMARY GRADE CHILDREN.NEWMAN RC II.1977; J. PERSONALITY ASSESS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 41; NO 2; PP. 164-169; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

THE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SEX-ROLE ORIENTATION, COGNITIVE COMPLEXITY, AND TOLERANCE FOR AMBIGUITYROTTER NG; O'CONNELL AN.1982; SEX ROLES; ISSN 0360-0025; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 8; NO 12; PP. 1209-1220; BIBL. 24 REF.Article

BLACK AND WHITE FATHER'S ATTITUDES TOWARD CHILDREN'S SEX ROLESPRICE BONHAM S; SKEEN P.1982; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 50; NO 3; PART. 2; PP. 1187-1190; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

BIRTH ORDER AND SEX-TYPESHAW JS; RODRIGUEZ W.1981; PSYCHOL. REP.; ISSN 0033-2941; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 48; NO 2; PP. 387-390; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

THEORY AND MEASUREMENT OF ANDROGENY: A REPLY TO THE PEDHAZUR-TETENBAUM AND LOCKSLEY-COLTEN CRITIQUESBEM SL.1979; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 37; NO 6; PP. 1047-1054; BIBL. 1 P.Article

NURSING STUDENTS: STEREO TYPICALLY FEMININEVANDEVER J.1978; PSYCHOL. REP.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 43; NO 1; PP. 10; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

A COMPARISON OF THE BEM SEX ROLE INVENTORY AND THE PRF ANDRO SCALE.GAYTON WF; HAWU GF; OZMON KL et al.1977; J. PERSONALITY ASSESS.; U.S.A.; DA. 1977; VOL. 41; NO 6; PP. 619-621; BIBL. 13 REF.Article

PREFERENCE FOR OCCUPATIONS IN RELATION TO MASCULINITY, FEMININITY, AND GENDERFEATHER NT; SAID JA.1983; BRITISH (THE) JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ISSN 0144-6665; GBR; DA. 1983; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 113-127; BIBL. 2 P.Article

ANDROGYNY AND SEX-TYPING: DIFFERENCES IN BELIEFS REGARDING GENDER POLARITY IN RATINGS OF IDEAL MEN AND WOMENMCPHERSON KS; SPETRINO SK.1983; SEX ROLES; ISSN 0360-0025; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 9; NO 4; PP. 441-451; BIBL. 22 REF.Article

FACTOR AND DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS OF THE BEM SEX-ROLE INVENTORYGRUBER KJ; POWERS WA.1982; J. PERS. ASSESS.; ISSN 0022-3891; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 46; NO 3; PP. 284-291; BIBL. 17 REF.Article

SEX-ROLE ORIENTATION OF GAY FATHERS VERSUS GAY NONFATHERSROBINSON BE; SKEEN P.1982; PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS; ISSN 0031-5125; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 55; NO 3; PART. 2; PP. 1055-1059; BIBL. 16 REF.Article

RESPONSE TENDENCY ON THE BEM SEX ROLE INVENTORYLIBERMAN D; GAA JP.1980; J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3980; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 106; NO 2; PP. 259-263; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

SELF-RATED ADJUSTMENT AND SEX-TYPING ON THE BEM SEX-ROLE INVENTORY: IS MASCULINITY THE PRIMARY PREDICTOR OF ADJUSTMENT.SILVERN LE; RYAN VL.1979; SEX ROLES; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 5; NO 6; PP. 739-763; BIBL. 20 REF.Article

SOCIAL ATTITUDE CORRELATES OF SEX ROLESMALL A; GROSS R; ERDWINS C et al.1979; J. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 101; NO 1; PP. 115-121; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

THE "GOOD MANAGER" MASCULINE OR ANDROGYNOUS.POWELL GN; BUTTERFIELD DA.1979; ACAD. MANAG. J.; USA; DA. 1979; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 395-403; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

FACTOR STRUCTURE IN THE BEM SEX ROLE INVENTORY: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF MASCULINITY, FEMININITY, AND ANDROGYNYFEATHER NT.1978; AUSTRAL. J. PSYCHOL.; AUS; DA. 1978; VOL. 30; NO 3; PP. 241-254; BIBL. 18 REF.Article

BOYS AND GIRLS TOGETHER - AND ALIENATED: ON ENACTING STEREOTYPED SEX ROLES IN MIXED-SEX DYADSICKES W; BARNES RD.1978; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 36; NO 7; PP. 669-683; BIBL. 51 REF.Article

DEVELOPMENT OF THE REVISED SEA ROLE BEHAVIOR SCALEORLOFSKY JL; RAMSDEN MW; COHEN RS et al.1982; J. PERS. ASSESS.; ISSN 0022-3891; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 46; NO 6; PP. 632-638; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

SEX, SEX ROLE, AND PSYCHOMOTOR REMINISCENCEMCLEAN BK; PAYNE RB.1982; ACTA PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0001-6918; NLD; DA. 1982; VOL. 51; NO 2; PP. 115-122; BIBL. 23 REF.Article

THE EFFECTS OF INTERPERSONAL SKILLS TRAINING ON SEX-ROLE IDENTITY OF PREMARITAL DATING PARTNERSRIDLEY CA; LAMKE LK; AVERY AW et al.1982; J. RES. PERS.; ISSN 0092-6566; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 16; NO 3; PP. 335-342; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

MOVEMENT TOWARD ANDROGYNY IN COLLEGE FEMALES THROUGH EXPERIENTAL EDUCATIONBENNETT BW; GROSSER GS.1981; J. PSYCHOL.; ISSN 0022-3980; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 107; NO 2; PP. 177-183; BIBL. 25 REF.Article

MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF NEW SEX ROLE FORMULATIONS AND PERSONALITYBERNARD LC.1980; J. PERSONNALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 38; NO 2; PP. 323-336; BIBL. 21 REF.Article

THE NONVERBAL DISPLAY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ANDROGYNYLAFRANCE M; CARMEN B.1980; J. PERSONALITY SOC. PSYCHOL.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 38; NO 1; PP. 36-49; BIBL. 23 REF.Article